Trending March 2024 # Comment: Apple Will Be Making A Mistake If It No Longer Offers A Low # Suggested April 2024 # Top 8 Popular

You are reading the article Comment: Apple Will Be Making A Mistake If It No Longer Offers A Low updated in March 2024 on the website Hatcungthantuong.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested April 2024 Comment: Apple Will Be Making A Mistake If It No Longer Offers A Low

One of the oft-heard criticisms of Apple is that it no longer cares about the Mac now that the bulk of its income comes from the iPhone.

Apple does gradually seem to be trying to dispel that idea. The complete redesign of the MacBook Pro in 2024 demonstrated a continuing interest in the company’s top-of-the-range laptop, even if not all pro users were happy with the direction it took. The iMac got a shot in the arm with a Pro model. The Mac Pro is now elderly, but Apple has at least promised an all-new model. A rejigging of the MacBook range could finally see the death of the ancient MacBook Air.

All of which leaves the Mac mini …

Apple is still selling a four-year-old version of the machine, with frankly embarrassing specs. The company hasn’t exactly offered much hope to Mac mini fans either. Asked about it last year, Phil Schiller said that it was ‘an important product’ but that the company had nothing to say about it as yet. Tim Cook later said only that Apple planned to keep the machine in the lineup – with no mention of an update.

A Bloomberg report yesterday appeared to offer both good and bad news. The good news is that there is apparently a refresh on the way at some point this year. The bad news is that it is expected to focus on the pro market – and be priced accordingly.

For this year’s model, Apple is focusing primarily on these pro users, and new storage and processor options are likely to make it more expensive than previous versions, the people said.

Apple is right to target pro users of the mini. But it would be wrong to ignore the more budget end of the market.

It’s true that Apple’s original target market for the budget machine when it was first launched back in 2005 no longer exists.

The Mac mini was launched at a time when most people had desktop PCs. Apple’s thinking was that it would be hard to persuade a Windows PC owner to abandon their entire investment in order to switch to a Mac. But if it could tell people that they could keep their existing monitor, keyboard and mouse, and buy an ultra-compact box to replace their lumbering great tower, it would have a better chance. And if it could make that switch affordable, then it would have a winning product.

Today, almost nobody in the budget computer demographic owns a desktop. Ancient models aside, today’s desktop PC buyers are those who need power and are prepared to pay for it. Indeed, Apple is almost unique in offering a desktop computer that ordinary people want to buy: the iMac.

But that doesn’t mean there isn’t a budget market for the Mac mini. It’s a different market, sure, but it’s arguably an even more important one.

Many people run a Mac mini as a home media server, for example. It’s small, near-silent and … inexpensive. Especially if you’re running it as a headless unit, as many do, using Screen Sharing or ssh to access it.

That ‘inexpensive’ part is an essential piece of the home server equation. A home server doesn’t require much processing power, so there’s no point splashing out cash on a higher spec than you need. If Apple were to offer only a high-powered model with a price-tag to match, many would simply buy a competitor box.

Most people running a Mac mini as a home server have another Mac; the mini is a secondary machine. Pushing them off the platform is potentially a dangerous thing to do. If they find they get on fine with Windows or Linux on their home server, they may well be tempted to switch away from Apple altogether when it’s time to upgrade their main machine.

There are developers, too, who do most of their work on a Windows PC but have a Mac mini for iOS and Mac development. If you already have the Windows setup, then you can simply connect to the Mac mini as required. Most developers are not wealthy, and cost will be a key consideration for many here. Losing the Mac mini as an affordable development machine could result in losing developers.

Then there are the tinkerers. The people who do have serious budget to spend on their computer kit but are currently happy with their Windows setup. I know several such who bought a Mac mini purely to have a play around with Mac, to see what it’s like – and found themselves converted. They later replaced their high-end Windows PC with a high-end Mac. But that initial prompt to experiment? That was because the Mac mini made it relatively cheap to do so.

For all these reasons, I think it would be a mistake on Apple’s part to neglect the $500 Mac mini market. The company should absolutely offer more powerful models for those using them in server farms – there’s a tonne of money to be made there.

But the budget market is also more important than I think Apple may realize. So I think it should also update the $500 model to today’s spec. No need to go overboard, just fit a modern processor and a modest SSD for silent operation and zippy performance. That’s all most budget buyers need – well, that and the wallet-friendly price-tag.

Photos: TrustMacintosh; Apple; Tradera

Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You're reading Comment: Apple Will Be Making A Mistake If It No Longer Offers A Low

Pov: Unionizing Bu Grad Students Would Be A Mistake

POV: Unionizing BU Grad Students Would Be a Mistake There are better ways to secure our rights

Following the National Labor Relations Board ruling this past August that graduate students at private universities who work as teaching or research assistants are employees who have the right to unionize, Graduate Workers Forward (GWF), a movement of faculty and graduate student workers spearheaded by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), has started to organize at BU, seeking to represent the graduate student employees who make up some of the University’s 14,150 graduate students. While laudable, this effort is misguided. Unions are a powerful option for change, but there may be better, more tried methods for graduate student employees to realize their goals. The choice for organizing needs careful consideration lest its costs outweigh its benefits. BU is such a case.

To evaluate unionization at BU, we must ask whether its current treatment of graduate employees is fair, and if not, whether change is possible. While unions address these concerns, so can other organizations, including the Graduate and Professional Leadership Council (GPLC) at BU. There are differences between a union and the GPLC. GWF claimed in a publication (sent by e-mail to the graduate student community in October) that a union can negotiate a contract while the GPLC cannot, presumably making the union superior. This is a half-truth, betraying ignorance of the GPLC’s structure. While nothing forbids the GPLC from negotiating a contract, it has no need of one. The GPLC, being integrated into the University, can serve graduate demands without one.

To make this position clearer, let’s examine what the aims of a union are and what the GPLC has accomplished. The GWF claims in the same document that it will provide pay raises, increased benefits, and employment stability, but these have already been achieved without it. In the past four years, unfunded PhD positions have been eliminated. We experienced an increase of funding packages from four to five years, with one year free of teaching and the option for a second for research. Travel grant money has increased. BU established a dissertation writing fellowship and moved to increase pay for graduate students to achieve interdepartmental parity. The student health fee has been eliminated and concerns of pregnant grad students have been addressed. Among others. Aren’t these achievements the same things the union is promising?

More concerning, given the opacity hostility creates, graduate students risk demanding money that other students, perhaps minority or poor students, require. BU’s pot is limited, and without cooperation, the administration will withhold information allowing a representative organization to understand how its demands deprive others. In the current representative structure, there is access to a holistic picture, allowing an understanding of how arrangements impact the entire community, restraining personal avarice.

It is not an insignificant fact that the administration at Boston University concurs with these arguments. In its official notice regarding its position on unionization, sent on December 18, the University provost signaled both her willingness to work with the GPLC and her opinion that a union represents a material and negative change to the relationship between the University and its graduate population. While this should not in and of itself be enough to argue against unionization, it is significant considering the goodwill and success we have had through exploring other options for engagement with the University administration, such as the GPLC. It is just another sign of what we have to lose.

There is a lot of rhetoric surrounding unionization. Much of it is emotionally powerful, particularly as it relates to the idea of strength. The GWF claims that as a union, it will negotiate as “equals.” That it will extract agreements from our University. That graduate students will have power. Given what they have already accomplished, are they not already equals? Or better yet, partners? Are they not already negotiating? Have they not already received results free from the costs of money and animosity? What, then, will the union provide that graduate students do not already have? There is certainly romanticism behind organizing labor and a union appeals to emotions in ways the GPLC cannot. This has its own value, but is sentiment worth what graduate students stand to lose? Do they really gain, either materially or emotionally, by giving up the comity they already have? These are the questions that must be answered and in answering them, it cannot but be seen that a union loses.

Jeffrey Bristol (GRS’18), a doctoral student in anthropology, can be reached at [email protected].

Explore Related Topics:

Comment: Selling An Iphone Without A Charger Would Be A Step Too Far

A new Kuo report suggests that Apple may for the first time sell an iPhone without a charger this year. It follows an earlier report that the iPhone 12 box will lack a second standard iPhone accessory: a pair of EarPods.

Both moves would save Apple money, and by more than the cost of the accessories themselves. As my colleague Benjamin Mayo noted, this would reduce the size and weight of the iPhone box, which would reduce Apple’s freight costs…

Apple’s argument for both moves would undoubtedly be that it’s better for the environment. If everyone has existing headphones and chargers, then including them with every iPhone is a wasteful manufacturing process and creates electrical waste. Those cheaper freight costs mean more iPhones per aircraft, reducing carbon emissions.

I’m on record as supporting a move to omit EarPods.

Back in the days of iPhones with 3.5mm headphone jacks, I’d long argued that it was silly including EarPods in the box. It made sense back in the iPod days, when the idea of a portable music device was a relatively new concept; it made no sense when anyone who listens to music on the move already has a pair of headphones.

Four years [after the removal of the headphone socket], we’re back in the situation we were with 3.5mm headphones. Most iPhone owners upgrade their phones at least every 3-4 years. That means that by the time the iPhone 12 comes out, most of them will already have at least one pair of Lightning EarPods — and a great many of them will have bought either AirPods or some other wireless headphones. Once more, the majority of the EarPods that come in an iPhone box would not be used

While some 60% of you agreed with me, more than a third disagreed, offering perfectly reasonable arguments. Some pointed out that EarPods can break, especially when used by kids, so it’s always handy to have spares. Others said that even if they use wireless headphones, they can run out of power, so it’s handy to have a wired backup. Some stash a pair of EarPods in each of the bags they use so they always have a pair to hand.

Opposition to the idea of selling an iPhone without a charger is even stronger.

Of all the cheap, lousy ways to save a buck…

I get not including earbuds, but I think a charger in the box is still worthwhile for another new iPhone. I mean, you can never have enough chargers, right?

I don’t care how many chargers you think the average person has, it’s a dumb idea.

I should say that personally I won’t care much. I almost exclusively charge wirelessly, and have three wireless charging stands: by the sofa, on my desk, and by the bed. When I travel, I use my MacBook Pro as a charging hub.

But I work from home. If I spent a lot of time on the move, I’d take the “redundant array of free chargers” approach, sticking a charging brick and Lightning cable in each of my bags, so I could plug in when required. If I needed faster charging speeds than wireless chargers provide, I’d have a bunch of wired chargers dotted about the apartment. I’d be very much in the “you can never have too many chargers” camp.

I do get where Apple is coming from. If you live in a world where there are always wireless chargers on tap — at home, in your car, in the office, in coffee shops across Silicon Valley — then a power brick might seem something of a quaint throwback to an earlier age. Apple may very well genuinely believe it’s an environmental waste.

But that is not yet the world in which everyone lives. This will be the right move at some point, but in my view, we’ve got a few more years to go before we get there. And that will probably be the point at which the iPhone goes portless anyway.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Can The Apple Tv 4K Be A Cord

We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn more ›

I cut the cable cord roughly three years ago and I’ve never regretted it. I have, however, accumulated a small village of set-top boxes, media sticks, Chromecasts, gaming consoles, and just about any other HDMI-connected rectangle that can spit out a Netflix stream. For the past two weeks, however, I put all of them on hold and committed fully to the Apple TV 4K. At $179 (for the 32GB model, the 64GB box pushes the price to $200), it costs almost twice as much as the excellent Roku Ultra, which means it should do just about everything the average cord cutter desires.

Is your TV up for it?

Before you read any further, you should consider whether or not your TV is ready for a box like this. The extra money you’ll spend on the 4K model (Apple sells a non-4K version for $149) leverages TV features like 4K resolution and HDR color. If your TV isn’t equipped with those features, you’re probably better off sticking to the lower model unless you’re willing to pony up for a new display, too.

What’s new?

The outside of the box is pretty much identical to its predecessor, minus the inaccessible USB-C port that used to be on the back for service purposes. Inside, however, things have changed. The box is built around Apple’s A10X Fusion processor, which it also uses in the iPad Pro. This is a two-generation jump up from the A8 found in the previous model, which is where that 4K-pushing power comes from.

A USB port for charging the remote would be a nice addition to the Apple TV’s backside. Stan Horaczek

The connections have been upgraded as well, including a Gigabit Ethernet port, Bluetooth 5.0, and 2.4GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands. I tried both wireless and wired connections and found the hardline connection was, unsurprisingly, faster and more reliable. The wireless works as well, it just sometimes required a little more waiting for things to load, especially if others were streaming on the network.

The new TVOS 11 update adds some functionality of its own, but it’s nothing you can’t also get on the cheaper and older versions. You can now pair AirPod headphones with an Apple TV, which is nice, but also a lot less practical than the simple headphone jack baked into the remote of the Roku box.

Picture and sound quality

When you feed the Apple TV 4K the high-res, HDR content it craves, it looks and sounds fantastic. It’s as good or better than any other streaming box I have used. The high-dynamic range colors pop, especially using the Dolby Vision tech. Oddly, in terms of sound, the Apple TV 4K isn’t compatible with Dolby Atmos, which is currently one of the most popular audio platforms for home theater.

The Apple TV 4K upscales content that isn’t up to its quality requirements when necessary, but you can still tell the difference between the native high-res content. This upscaling allows the Apple TV to stay in Dolby Vision mode, regardless of content. It can be a little confusing, but Apple says it prevents compatibility errors and weird screen glitches caused by switching signal types. If that’s the case, then it works because I didn’t have any issues in that regard. You will, however, probably notice some 1080p content doesn’t look perfect. The difference is minimal, but if you’re a stickler for things like digital noise in a picture, it may bug you.

The Watch Now screen recommends content you might like, so if you want to watch Wonder Woman for the 30th time, you can get right to it. Apple

Content availability

This is where things get tricky if this is your only cord-cutting solution. Right now, the iTunes store has an impressive selection of 4K HDR content available for $20 to purchase or $5.99 to rent if you want new releases. There are sales, though, and I rented Kong: Skull Island for $3 and got to enjoy the full HDR display. You also don’t have to pay extra to upgrade movies you already own to get the best possible picture.

The biggest negative right now, however, is the lack of Amazon content, but Apple says compatibility is coming in the next few months. But, even then, you’ll have to buy the content from a computer or your phone, and then watch it on the Apple TV because purchases are iTunes only. This isn’t new for Apple users, but it’s still inconvenient. Same goes for other services like Vudu.

YouTube is another outlier in that you’re capped at 1080p, even though there’s a lot of 4K and beyond content up on the service. The issue can be chalked up to a codec incompatibility that likely won’t be solved anytime soon, so this isn’t the box for you if YouTube is a primary content source (for that Chromecast would be a good choice).

Other notable omissions in 4K are Disney and Marvel movies, so if you’re a Snow White or superhero buff, you’ll have to look elsewhere, at least for now.

Lastly, you can’t directly plug in a hard drive like you can with Roku and other boxes like the Nvidia Shield. It shouldn’t come as a surprise, but it’s likely a deal breaker for some users.

It took me five minutes to find this remote before I could take this picture. It’s still easy to lose. Stan Horaczek

Siri and the remote

The remote’s battery lasts well over a week on a single charge, but the fact that there’s no USB port to charge it still seems so odd. (It has a Lightning connector, so you charge it that way, like an iPhone.) The Apple TV Remote app does, however, have a tighter integration into iOS 11, putting controls directly in the Control Center, so you don’t have to navigate to the TV Remote App.

Asking Siri to find content is still impressively effective. My typical Siri requests on a daily basis are met with hit-or-miss results, but the digital assistant thrives in the TV settings. Siri found the latest episode of The Goldbergs in Hulu, and Big in the iTunes video store without a hiccup. You can also ask Siri specifically to show you 4K HDR content if you just want to make the most of your fancy streaming box and snazzy TV. A nice touch is the fact that the OS can recognize which apps you have subscriptions for, so it won’t prioritize Game of Thrones content on your home screen if you can’t actually watch it.

Conclusion

When I first started writing this review, the most obvious comparison was to the Roku Ultra, which is so much cheaper that it seemed unfair. But, using the Apple TV 4K more made me realize that the two are very different in reality. While the Roku’s compatibility with different services is superior, it lacks access to the iTunes store, which is actually the best place to get 4K HDR new releases, at least for the moment. The Apple TV 4K also has access to a wide breadth of apps from the App Store, so it offers entertainment beyond things you can watch.

The Apple TV 4K also goes beyond its role as an entertainment device as a hub for the company’s HomeKit smart home platform. For instance, I was able to set up an automated process that turned on the living room lights (powered by Philips Hue bulbs), when I walked through the door. Again, this requires further assimilation into the Apple ecosystem, but it sure is handy when you have an arm full of groceries.

If you plan on using the extra features, then the Apple TV 4K is definitely worth the extra cash. Just make sure your TV is up to it before taking the plunge.

Polystaker Offers A Safe Yield Farming Dapp

Yield farming has been gaining traction as one of the most lucrative crypto investment strategies with high liquidity. It gives crypto investors a greater chance to increase their revenue and earn higher ROI. Yield Farming happens through decentralized applications (dapps) that run on a blockchain network. They have no third party involved and eliminate the downtime. Therefore, dapps have been a game-changing tool for the Blockchain world.

Yield farming and the possibility of getting passive income are becoming popular and attracting many users, increasing the liquidity of DeFi projects.

Common Yield Farming Risks

As yield farming is a competitive, fast-paced, and volatile market, determining and estimating ROI in yield farming is very difficult and confusing – particularly for newbies. Therefore, many hesitate in investing in yield farming.

Here are a few other common risks associated with Yield Farming:

Liquidity risk 

Price risk

Strategy risk

Scam risk

POLYStaker for Yield Farming

Now, what if you found a dapp that promises 250% ROI, chúng tôi a Haze Crypto audited yield farming dapp, gives 100% to 260% ROI on deposits. It is a Smart Contract based dapp on POLYGON Chain, and as the name suggests, this dapp allows only one type of crypto asset: Matic.

What makes POLYStaker a safe yield farming Dapp? 

1. Easy User Interface

2. Easy Deposit

POLYStaker.app features a simple deposit feature. All you have to do is connect your DeFi wallet via QR scan or browser login. You don’t need to be a dapp expert to start. Having a crypto wallet and MATIC are the primary requirements – and they are more than enough.

3.High ROI

The high ROI of 260% has attracted many investors to the POLYStaker.app

1 Plan investment offers a profit from 8.5% per day. The total earned profit varies from 127.5% from 15 days

2 Plan investment offers a profit from 7.5% per day. The total earned profit varies from 150% from 20 days

3 Plan Random investment offers a profit from 4.5%-12.5% per day. The amount of profit received is determined randomly. The total profit varies from 90-260% 

4 Plan (locked) investment offers profit from 12.5% per day. The total earned profit varies from 260% for 20 days

Profit growths +0.5% daily, only for new deposits

Hold-bonus +0.1% daily, max. +2%. Only for plans 1-3

Minimal deposit: 5 MATIC

Reinvest function. Users can choose plan and reinvest 20-100% withdrawable balance. 

Bonuses if user does it:

+0.5% daily profit on chosen plan

+2% to reinvestment`s amount

4. Safe and Secure 

As already stated, the decentralized finance industry is laden with multiple risk factors. However, POLYStaker is safe from any vulnerabilities, scams, and errors. It has been thoroughly audited by Haze Crypto.

5. Round the Clock Support  POLYStaker has a 24/7 user support staff available to answer any queries and concerns. Users can contact support staff on POLYStaker’s Telegram and other social media accounts.

Is POLYStakers Worth a Try? 

Yield Farming has a successful future in the blockchain world, and POLYStakers is here to contribute to its development. There are many good reasons why you should choose POLYStakers.app for MATIC yield farming. But, the biggest reason is that it offers the highest yield safely on Polygon Chain. It is a secure and reliable dapp with guaranteed high ROI.

Top 10 Aiops Companies Making A Breakthrough In 2023

These top AIOps companies are exploding the IT industry in 2023

Managing the day-to-day growing volumes of company data with traditional practices seems next to impossible. That’s where “

Datadog

Datadog is a SaaS-based data analytics platform for monitoring servers, databases, tools, and services. It automatically collects logs from all your apps and services and allows you to seamlessly navigate between logs, metrics, and request traces. There are numerous visualization tools and drag-drop widgets, which you can use to customize your dashboards as per your needs. See business metrics and performance overviews side-by-side for easy correlation. You can even explore infrastructure, UX, logs, network, and security performance together for complete visibility.  

Dynatrace

Powered by Cisco, AppDynamics is on a mission to help companies see their technology through the lens of the business so they can work as one to prioritize what matters most. We’re reinventing the observability space and simplifying the challenge of digital transformation for the world’s largest enterprises. In this era of unprecedented digital growth, the AppDynamics Business Observability Platform transforms organizations faster by providing business context deep into the technology stack, aligning teams around shared priorities, and enabling technologists to act with confidence and control. AppDynamics has been recognized by Gartner as a leader in the APM market for more than eight years and was positioned highest in ‘ability to execute’ in Gartner’s 2023 Magic Quadrant Report for APM.  

Instana

Instana’s Enterprise Observability Platform, powered by automated Application Performance Monitoring, discovers and maps all services, infrastructure, and their inter-dependencies automatically. Instana ingests all observability metrics, traces each request, profiles every process, and updates application dependency maps in real-time to deliver the context and actionable feedback needed by Dev+Ops to optimize application performance, enable innovation, and mitigate risk to help them add value and efficiency to the pipeline.  

Turbonomic

Turbonomic, an IBM Company, provides software used by customers to assure application performance and governance by dynamically resourcing applications across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Turbonomic Network Performance Management (NPM) provides modern monitoring and analytics solutions to help assure continuous network performance at scale across multivendor networks for enterprises, carriers, and managed services providers.  

Moogsoft

Moogsoft lets you mitigate risk, increase agility, and fast-track your innovation goals. Moogsoft consolidates visibility and control of monitoring tools to help entire IT Ops and DevOps teams reduce noise, prioritize incidents, reduce escalations and ensure uptime. Working from anywhere, users can easily find and resolve the root cause of incidents before they become outages. With patented AI analyzing billions of events daily across the most complex IT environments, Moogsoft helps IT teams work faster and smarter.  

BigPanda

BigPanda provides Event Correlation and Automation, powered by

Netreo

Netreo is the most comprehensive IT Operations full-stack monitoring and

OpsRamp

OpsRamp’s modern, SaaS-based platform provides enterprise IT teams and managed service providers comprehensive IT operations management (ITOM) from discovery to monitoring to remediation and automation in a single, unified solution.  

StackState

StackState, the only topology-powered observability company, was founded in 2024 and is headquartered in Boston, with European operations in The Netherlands. Their sole focus and deep expertise lie in solving observability issues for their customers. StackState provides software for cloud-native and hybrid environments, as well as professional services and technical support. StackState delivers a new and essential capability for managing today’s complex hybrid, cloud, and container environments.  

More Trending Stories 

Update the detailed information about Comment: Apple Will Be Making A Mistake If It No Longer Offers A Low on the Hatcungthantuong.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!